One pre-loaded 3 mL multi-dose pen, pen needles, a printed dosing guide, a verification sticker, and your batch certificate of analysis. Ships in an insulated cold-chain box with a temperature indicator.
Every batch is tested by independent third-party labs for identity, purity and sterility. Scan the QR code on your pen or enter your batch number online to download the certificate of analysis for your exact lot.
↓ Download COA (PDF)Orders placed before 12:00 ship the same day in cold-chain packaging, and delivery across Europe takes 3–5 business days. Used products cannot be returned. If your pen arrives broken or isn't working, we'll replace it free of charge — just share photos or a short video showing the issue.
For research reference only. These tables separate established clinical dosing from research-use guidance and are not medical instructions or a recommendation for human use. Body Pharm research pens are not approved medicines. Always consult a qualified clinician.
There is no authorised human dosage, and the FDA reports it has not identified human exposure data adequate to establish safety.
| Research tier | Reported dose | Frequency | Cycle |
|---|---|---|---|
| Introductory | 5 mg | Once weekly | ~4 weeks |
| Common practitioner protocol | 5 mg | Twice weekly | 8–12 weeks |
| Higher practitioner protocol | 5 mg | 2–3× weekly | ~8 weeks |
| Pulse protocol | 5 mg | Every five days | Four administrations |
No human trial supports a defined schedule; reported protocols vary widely.
MOTS-c is a mitochondrial-derived peptide encoded within the mitochondrial genome itself. It acts as a metabolic messenger, activating AMPK signalling to support cellular energy production, glucose handling and exercise capacity.
Because circulating levels decline with age, MOTS-c has become one of the most studied peptides in the longevity and performance space.
Users typically report improved endurance, faster recovery between sessions and steadier energy through the day. Research interest centres on insulin sensitivity, fat oxidation and mitochondrial biogenesis.
Effects build gradually — most protocols are assessed after 8–12 weeks alongside training load and bloodwork.
Common protocols run 5–10 mg per week, split across two to three doses, cycled 8–12 weeks on with a 4-week washout. The pen dials in precise increments so your clinician can titrate to your response.
Never exceed the maximum printed on your dosing guide, and review bloodwork with your clinician before each new cycle.
Store the pen refrigerated between uses. Attach a fresh needle, dial your prescribed dose, press the button until the counter returns to zero, and hold for six seconds before withdrawing.
Most protocols run five days on, two days off — your printed dosing guide covers the exact schedule agreed with your clinician.
Educational content only — not medical advice. Consult your clinician before starting any protocol.
Our MOTS-c pen holds 32 mg in 3 ml as a pre-loaded multi-dose pen. MOTS-c is one of the more genuinely interesting molecules in this catalogue on mechanistic grounds — it is encoded in mitochondrial rather than nuclear DNA — and one of the least developed clinically. Both facts belong on the same page. Batch certificates are published at /coa.
The foundational work is well cited and entirely preclinical. No human efficacy trial has been published. Lee C et al. The mitochondrial-derived peptide MOTS-c promotes metabolic homeostasis and reduces obesity and insulin resistance. Cell Metab 2015;21(3):443–454. PMID 25738459; MOTS-c: a novel mitochondrial-derived peptide regulating muscle and fat metabolism. PMC5116416; Mitochondria-derived peptide MOTS-c: effects and mechanisms related to stress, metabolism and aging. PMC9854231; The mitochondrial-derived peptide MOTS-c: a player in exceptional longevity? PMID 26289118
MOTS-c is a 16-amino-acid peptide encoded by a short open reading frame within the mitochondrial 12S ribosomal RNA. Almost every peptide of research interest is encoded in nuclear DNA; MOTS-c is not.
That is genuinely unusual and it is the reason the 2015 paper attracted the attention it did. It suggested mitochondria act as a signalling origin rather than only as an energy-producing organelle — a conceptual shift rather than an incremental finding.
It also explains why MOTS-c gets filed alongside NAD+ under headings like “mitochondrial peptides” despite the two being completely different kinds of molecule. NAD+ is a coenzyme, not a peptide. That confusion is addressed at mitochondrial peptides.
The 2015 work identified skeletal muscle as the primary target organ. The described cellular route is inhibition of the folate cycle and the de novo purine biosynthesis tethered to it, producing a large increase in endogenous AICAR — reported as greater than twenty-fold — which in turn activates AMPK signalling.
AMPK is a central metabolic sensor, which is why activating it is the mechanistic hook for essentially every metabolic claim made about this compound.
In mice, MOTS-c treatment prevented age-dependent and high-fat-diet-induced insulin resistance, and prevented diet-induced obesity — the finding behind the weight-loss listing. Later work explored relationships between exercise, dietary intervention, ageing and MOTS-c production, with skeletal muscle as the main target of the circulating peptide and evidence pointing to fat cells as a further one.
Every one of those findings is from cell culture or rodent models. No published human efficacy trial exists. There is no established human dose, no human safety dataset, and no clinical outcome data of any kind.
The gap between “prevented diet-induced obesity in mice” and any statement about a person is the entire distance between preclinical and clinical evidence, and no amount of mechanistic elegance closes it.
Queries about MOTS-c are dominated by PubMed Central, anti-doping bodies and reference sources rather than by merchants. That reflects the compound’s actual position: it is an active research subject with a real literature and no commercial clinical development behind it.
We mention this because it shapes what an honest page can offer. On a compound this early, the useful contribution is an accurate statement of what has been shown and in what species — not a longer version of the same mechanistic summary.
A research pen containing MOTS-c, third-party tested per batch for identity, purity and sterility, with the certificate for the specific lot reachable from the QR code. MOTS-c holds no marketing authorisation anywhere.
What we can evidence is what is in the pen. What we cannot evidence — and will not imply — is an outcome in a human being, because nobody has published one — under this heading or under peptides for longevity.
Related: what is MOTS-c?, MOTS-c vs NAD+, peptides for energy, the recovery goal page.
We use cookies for analytics and marketing to improve your experience. You can accept or reject non-essential cookies. Privacy Policy